Abstract
Three-dimensional metal complexes synthesized from copper dicarboxylates and triethylenediamine (TED), which have an ideal pore size for methane adsorption, have higher methane adsorption capacity than the theoretical maximum for activated carbons.
Keywords
AdsorptionMethaneMetalCopperIdeal (ethics)Chemical engineeringChemistryInorganic chemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal–organic frameworks
Adsorptive separation is very important in industry. Generally, the process uses porous solid materials such as zeolites, activated carbons, or silica gels as adsorbents. With a...
Carbon Electrodes for Double-Layer Capacitors I. Relations Between Ion and Pore Dimensions
We characterized activated carbon electrodes for electrical double‐layer capacitor (EDLC) systems. High‐surface‐area carbons were prepared by carbonization of cotton cloth at el...
MOF-Based Membranes for Gas Separations
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) represent the largest known class of porous crystalline materials ever synthesized. Their narrow pore windows and nearly unlimited structural and...
Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources
Abstract Since the time of the industrial revolution, the atmospheric CO 2 concentration has risen by nearly 35 % to its current level of 383 ppm. The increased carbon dioxide c...
Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks
For any potential hydrogen-storage system, raw uptake capacity must be balanced with the kinetics and thermodynamics of uptake and release. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) provi...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2001
- Type
- article
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1496-1497
- Citations
- 190
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
190
OpenAlex
Cite This
Kenji Seki
(2001).
Design of an adsorbent with an ideal pore structure for methane adsorption using metal complexes.
Chemical Communications
(16)
, 1496-1497.
https://doi.org/10.1039/b104204c
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1039/b104204c