Abstract
Generation of a T cell-mediated antitumor response depends on T cell receptor engagement by major histocompatibility complex/antigen as well as CD28 ligation by B7. CTLA-4 is a second B7 receptor expressed by T cells upon activation that, unlike CD28, appears to deliver an inhibitory signal to T cells. Recently, we and others demonstrated that administration of an anti-CTLA-4 antibody was sufficient to promote regression of several murine tumors. However, certain tumors, such as the SM1 mammary carcinoma, remain refractory to this type of immunotherapy. In the present study, we report that the combination of both CTLA-4 blockade and a vaccine consisting of granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor-expressing SM1 cells resulted in regression of parental SM1 tumors, despite the ineffectiveness of either treatment alone. This synergistic therapy resulted in long-lasting immunity to SM1 and depended on both CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. Interestingly, synergy was not observed between CTLA-4 and a B7-expressing SM1 vaccine. Given that granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes differentiation and activation of dendritic cells as well as enhances cross-priming of T cells to tumor-derived antigens and that SM1 is major histocompatibility complex class II-negative, our findings suggest that CTLA-4 blockade acts at the level of a host-derived antigen-presenting cell. In addition, these results also support the idea that the most effective and synergistic vaccine strategy targets treatments that enhance T cell priming at the level of host-derived antigen-presenting cells.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The biologic importance of tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes
Detailed pathologic analysis has delineated a close association between intratumoral CD 8 + cytotoxic T cells and favorable clinical outcomes in diverse cancers. Conversely, the...
Breast cancer instructs dendritic cells to prime interleukin 13–secreting CD4+ T cells that facilitate tumor development
We previously reported (Bell, D., P. Chomarat, D. Broyles, G. Netto, G.M. Harb, S. Lebecque, J. Valladeau, J. Davoust, K.A. Palucka, and J. Banchereau. 1999. J. Exp. Med. 190: 1...
Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade
The release of negative regulators of immune activation (immune checkpoints) that limit antitumor responses has resulted in unprecedented rates of long-lasting tumor responses i...
The interaction between HMGB1 and TLR4 dictates the outcome of anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy
Summary: For the last four decades, the treatment of cancer has relied on four treatment modalities, namely surgery, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and hormonotherapy. Mo...
Signatures of T cell dysfunction and exclusion predict cancer immunotherapy response
Cancer treatment by immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) can bring long-lasting clinical benefits, but only a fraction of patients respond to treatment. To predict ICB response, we ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1998
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 10067-10071
- Citations
- 373
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.17.10067