Abstract

Abstract Covariance structure modeling, also known as structural equation modeling or causal modeling, appears increasingly popular. Such techniques can be used to conduct tests of complex theory on empirical data. To conduct such tests, researchers need measures of known factor structure and the knowledge of structural relations among the constructs of interest. Researchers typically have neither the required measures nor the knowledge of structural relations. Instead of conducting tests of theory, researchers use covariance structure models to develop measurements and theoretical models. This paper discusses why such use of covariance structure models is unlikely to produce scientific progress and proposes some alternative procedures thought to be more fruitful.

Keywords

CovarianceStructural equation modelingCausal modelEconometricsCausal structureComputer scienceManagement scienceMathematicsMachine learningStatisticsEconomics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
201-213
Citations
344
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

344
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael Τ. Brannick (1995). Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 16 (3) , 201-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160303

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/job.4030160303