Abstract

Results suggest some specific diagnostic areas in which further revision of the DISC is warranted. Three main sources of variability in DISC-clinician diagnostic agreement were evident over and above that due to the instrument itself, including (1) the informant used, (2) the algorithm applied in synthesizing symptom reports, and (3) the design of the validity comparison.

Keywords

Medical diagnosisPsychologyCriterion validityPsychiatryAnxietyConduct disorderClinical psychologyTest validityPsychometricsMedicineConstruct validityPathology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1996
Type
article
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
878-888
Citations
400
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

400
OpenAlex

Cite This

Mary Schwab‐Stone, David Shaffer, Mina K. Dulcan et al. (1996). Criterion Validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry , 35 (7) , 878-888. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199607000-00013

Identifiers

DOI
10.1097/00004583-199607000-00013