Abstract

Parkinson's disease evolves slowly, and there is current interest in exploring the earliest stages of the disorder, because of new approaches to studying pathogenesis and developing potential neuroprotective treatment. Recognizing early Parkinson's disease is not easy. The certainty of diagnosis increases as the disease advances. To address the problem of identifying Parkinson's disease in its initial phases of clinical expression, we propose the following designated levels of confidence for the diagnosis: (1) clinically possible, (2) clinically probable, and (3) clinically definite. Laboratory support for the diagnosis may be applied to each category. Criteria are provided as a framework underpinning this classification.

Keywords

DiseaseParkinson's diseaseMedicineIntensive care medicineNeuroprotectionPathologyInternal medicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease

The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association charged a workgroup with the task of developing criteria for the symptomatic predementia phase of Alzheimer's dis...

2011 Alzheimer s & Dementia 9670 citations

Publication Info

Year
1992
Type
review
Volume
32
Issue
S1
Pages
S125-S127
Citations
625
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

625
OpenAlex

Cite This

Donald B. Calne, B. J. Snow, C. Lee (1992). Criteria for diagnosing Parkinson's disease. Annals of Neurology , 32 (S1) , S125-S127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410320721

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/ana.410320721