Abstract

The demand for image-processing software for radiology applications has been increasing, fueled by advancements in both image-acquisition and image-analysis techniques. The utility of existing image-processing software is often limited by cost, lack of flexibility, and/or specific hardware requirements. In particular, many existing packages cannot directly utilize images formatted using the specifications in part 10 of the DICOM standard ("DICOM images"). We show how image analyses can be performed directly on DICOM images by using ImageJ, a free, Java-based image-processing package (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). We demonstrate how plug-ins written in our laboratory can be used along with the ImageJ macro script language to create flexible, low-cost, multiplatform image-processing applications that can be directed by information contained in the DICOM image header.

Keywords

DICOMComputer scienceSoftwareImage processingHeaderFlexibility (engineering)Plug-inComputer graphics (images)JavaMedical imagingImage (mathematics)Computer visionComputer hardwareArtificial intelligenceOperating system

MeSH Terms

HumansImage ProcessingComputer-AssistedInternetRadiology Information SystemsSoftwareUser-Computer Interface

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Learning to See in the Dark

Imaging in low light is challenging due to low photon count and low SNR. Short-exposure images suffer from noise, while long exposure can induce blur and is often impractical. A...

2018 1204 citations

Publication Info

Year
2005
Type
article
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
91-99
Citations
59
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

59
OpenAlex
2
Influential
41
CrossRef

Cite This

Daniel P. Barboriak, Anthony O. Padua, Gerald E. York et al. (2005). Creation of DICOM—Aware Applications Using ImageJ. Journal of Digital Imaging , 18 (2) , 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-004-1879-4

Identifiers

DOI
10.1007/s10278-004-1879-4
PMID
15827831
PMCID
PMC3046706

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%