Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Evaluating surrogate markers.
We discuss approaches for efficiently evaluating potential surrogate markers; in particular, we focus on case-cohort designs in which marker evaluation is undertaken only for a ...
Empirical Evidence of Bias
<h3>Objective.</h3> —To determine if inadequate approaches to randomized controlled trial design and execution are associated with evidence of bias in estimating treatment effec...
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
The average bias associated with defects in the conduct of randomised trials varies with the type of outcome. Systematic reviewers should routinely assess the risk of bias in th...
Are There Two Logistic Regressions for Retrospective Studies?
A comparison is made between two different approaches to the linear logistic regression analysis of retrospective study data: the prospective model wherein the dependent variabl...
Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled?
Phase 3 clinical trials, which evaluate the effect that new interventions have on the clinical outcomes of particular relevance to the patient (such as death, loss of vision, or...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2004
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 454-460
- Citations
- 245
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.014