Abstract
For over a decade corporate managers have been admonished to be more socially responsible, but seldom is any precise and operational definition of corporate social responsibility proferred. With a new definition of social responsibility comes a new approach to implementation.
Keywords
Corporate social responsibilitySocial responsibilityBusinessStakeholderPublic relationsCorporate securityAccountingLaw and economicsEconomicsPolitical science
Related Publications
Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in Community Mental Health Agencies: A Multiple Stakeholder Analysis
Objectives. We sought to identify factors believed to facilitate or hinder evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation in public mental health service systems as a step in deve...
Managerial Dilemmas
In organisation theory a schism has developed between the traditional organisational behaviour literature, based in psychology, sociology and political science, and the more ana...
THE BELIEF STRUCTURE OF MANAGERS RELATIVE TO WORK CONCEPTS MEASURED BY A FACTOR ANALYTIC MODEL<sup>1</sup>
Studies in the early seventies suggested that the traditional work ethic position was changing and that the American worker was expressing new needs for interesting and challeng...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1980
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 59-67
- Citations
- 963
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
963
OpenAlex
Cite This
Thomas M. Jones
(1980).
Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined.
California Management Review
, 22
(3)
, 59-67.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41164877
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/41164877