Abstract

Previous research has shown that dispositional optimism is a prospective predictor of successful adaptation to stressful encounters. In this research we attempted to identify possible mechanisms underlying these effects by examining how optimists differ from pessimists in the kinds of coping strategies that they use. The results of two separate studies revealed modest but reliable positive correlations between optimism and problem-focused coping, seeking of social support, and emphasizing positive aspects of the stressful situation. Pessimism was associated with denial and distancing (Study 1), with focusing on stressful feelings, and with disengagement from the goal with which the stressor was interfering (Study 2). Study 1 also found a positive association between optimism and acceptance/resignation, but only when the event was construed as uncontrollable. Discussion centers on the implications of these findings for understanding the meaning of people's coping efforts in stressful circumstances.

Keywords

PsychologyOptimismPessimismCoping (psychology)Disengagement theoryStressorSocial psychologyDenialDistancingFeelingSocial supportDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Psychotherapist

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The future of optimism.

Recent theoretical discussions of optimism as an inherent aspect of human nature converge with empirical investigations of optimism as an individual difference to show that opti...

2000 American Psychologist 1079 citations

Publication Info

Year
1986
Type
article
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
1257-1264
Citations
1066
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1066
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael F. Scheier, Jagdish K. Weintraub, Charles S. Carver (1986). Coping with stress: Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 (6) , 1257-1264. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1257

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1257