Abstract
Abstract Estimating protein–protein interaction energies is a very challenging task for current simulation protocols. Here, absolute binding free energies are reported for the complex H‐Ras/C‐Raf1 using the MM‐PB(GB)SA approach, testing the internal consistency and model dependence of the results. Averaging gas‐phase energies (MM), solvation free energies as determined by Generalized Born models (GB/SA), and entropic contributions calculated by normal mode analysis for snapshots obtained from 10 ns explicit‐solvent molecular dynamics in general results in an overestimation of the binding affinity when a solvent‐accessible surface area‐dependent model is used to estimate the nonpolar solvation contribution. Applying the sum of a cavity solvation free energy and explicitly modeled solute–solvent van der Waals interaction energies instead provides less negative estimates for the nonpolar solvation contribution. When the polar contribution to the solvation free energy is determined by solving the Poisson–Boltzmann equation (PB) instead, the calculated binding affinity strongly depends on the atomic radii set chosen. For three GB models investigated, different absolute deviations from PB energies were found for the unbound proteins and the complex. As an alternative to normal‐mode calculations, quasiharmonic analyses have been performed to estimate entropic contributions due to changes of solute flexibility upon binding. However, such entropy estimates do not converge after 10 ns of simulation time, indicating that sampling issues may limit the applicability of this approach. Finally, binding free energies estimated from snapshots of the unbound proteins extracted from the complex trajectory result in an underestimate of binding affinity. This points to the need to exercise caution in applying the computationally cheaper “one‐trajectory‐alternative” to systems where there may be significant changes in flexibility and structure due to binding. The best estimate for the binding free energy of Ras–Raf obtained in this study of −8.3 kcal mol −1 is in good agreement with the experimental result of −9.6 kcal mol −1 , however, further probing the transferability of the applied protocol that led to this result is necessary. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2: 238–250, 2003
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
A Gibbs free energy correlation for automated docking of carbohydrates
Abstract Thermodynamic information can be inferred from static atomic configurations. To model the thermodynamics of carbohydrate binding to proteins accurately, a large binding...
Calculation of the free energy of association for protein complexes
Abstract We have developed a method for calculating the association energy of quaternary complexes starting from their atomic coordinates. The association energy is described as...
Quantum Calculation of Molecular Energies and Energy Gradients in Solution by a Conductor Solvent Model
A new implementation of the conductor-like screening solvation model (COSMO) in the GAUSSIAN94 package is presented. It allows Hartree−Fock (HF), density functional (DF) and pos...
Evaluation of the dispersion contribution to the solvation energy. A simple computational model in the continuum approximation
Abstract We present a simple computational method for the evaluation of solute‐solvent dispersion energy contributions in dilute isotropic solutions, supplementing the method wi...
A new definition of cavities for the computation of solvation free energies by the polarizable continuum model
A set of rules for determining the atomic radii of spheres used to build the molecular cavities in continuum solvation models are presented. The procedure is applied to compute ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2003
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-250
- Citations
- 851
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.10379