Abstract

<i>The paper presents a variety of meta analysis models of woodland recreation benefit estimates, contrasting conventionally estimated models with those provided by novel, multi-level modeling (MLM) techniques (Goldstein 1995). Our conventional models suggest that studies carried out by certain authors are associated with unusually large residuals within our meta-analysis. However, the MLMapproach explicitly incorporates the hierarchical nature of meta-analysis data, with estimates nested within study sites and authors. These residuals are not a significant determinant upon values, suggesting that, at least in this aspect, estimates may be more robust than indicated by less sophisticated models.</i> (JELQ26)

Keywords

RecreationWoodlandConsistency (knowledge bases)Meta-analysisVariety (cybernetics)EconometricsStatisticsRandom effects modelComputer scienceMathematicsEcologyArtificial intelligenceBiology

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
article
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
235-258
Citations
160
Access
Closed

Citation Metrics

160
OpenAlex
8
Influential

Cite This

Ian J. Bateman, Andy Jones (2003). Contrasting Conventional with Multi-Level Modeling Approaches to Meta-Analysis: Expectation Consistency in U.K. Woodland Recreation Values. Land Economics , 79 (2) , 235-258. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146869

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/3146869

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%