Complicity and Reproduction in Teaching Physical Education

1999 Sport Education and Society 64 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper draws on data collected from a life history study to consider the social significance of masculine identity in teaching physical education (PE). Using Connell's (1995) theory of multiple masculinities and gender power relations from a critical post‐structuralist perspective, notions of hegemonic masculinity are problem‐atized. It is argued that complicity to a hegemonic norm represents a form of masculine teaching identity that facilitates the reproduction of hegemonic forms of masculinity and patriarchy in PE and school sport. The data illustrate that in managing their masculine teaching identities to accommodate the social expectations placed upon them, the participants draw upon their background experience and in so doing shift their teaching identities towards a complicit masculine teaching identity. Although unintentional this situation represents a dilemma that serves to perpetuate a link between generations of PE discourse and practice helping to reproduce and legitimize hegemonic masculinity and the gender order in physical education.

Keywords

ComplicityReproductionBiologyPolitical scienceEcologyLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Manly States

Much has been written on how masculinity shapes international relations, but little feminist scholarship has focused on how international relations shape masculinity. Charlotte ...

2001 Columbia University Press eBooks 327 citations

Publication Info

Year
1999
Type
article
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
143-159
Citations
64
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

64
OpenAlex

Cite This

David Brown (1999). Complicity and Reproduction in Teaching Physical Education. Sport Education and Society , 4 (2) , 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357332990040203

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/1357332990040203