Abstract

Nonrandomized studies are often conservative in estimating absolute risks of harms. It would be useful to compare and scrutinize the evidence on harms obtained from both randomized and nonrandomized studies.

Keywords

Randomized controlled trialMedicineRelative riskAbsolute risk reductionPsychological interventionMEDLINENumber needed to treatNumber needed to harmIntensive care medicineInternal medicineConfidence intervalPsychiatry

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2006
Type
article
Volume
174
Issue
5
Pages
635-641
Citations
230
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

230
OpenAlex

Cite This

Panagiotis N. Papanikolaou (2006). Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Canadian Medical Association Journal , 174 (5) , 635-641. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050873

Identifiers

DOI
10.1503/cmaj.050873