Abstract
Abstract. We compare three common types of clustering algorithms for use with community data. TWINSPAN is divisive hierarchical, flexible‐UPGMA is agglomerative and hierarchical, and ALOC is non‐hierarchical. A balanced design six‐factor model was used to generate 480 data sets of known characteristics. Recovery of the embedded clusters suggests that both flexible UPGMA and ALOC are significantly better than TWINSPAN. No significant difference existed between flexible UPGMA and ALOC.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
A dendrite method for cluster analysis
Abstract A method for identifying clusters of points in a multidimensional Euclidean space is described and its application to taxonomy considered. It reconciles, in a sense, tw...
An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set
A Monte Carlo evaluation of 30 procedures for determining the number of clusters was conducted on artificial data sets which contained either 2, 3, 4, or 5 distinct nonoverlappi...
SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH
This paper presents a new and simple method to find indicator species and species assemblages characterizing groups of sites. The novelty of our approach lies in the way we comb...
Introduction to Data Mining
1 Introduction 1.1 What is Data Mining? 1.2 Motivating Challenges 1.3 The Origins of Data Mining 1.4 Data Mining Tasks 1.5 Scope and Organization of the Book 1.6 Bibliog...
Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation
Cluster analysis is the automated search for groups of related observations in a dataset. Most clustering done in practice is based largely on heuristic but intuitively reasonab...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1993
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-348
- Citations
- 168
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/3235592