Abstract

Abstract. We compare three common types of clustering algorithms for use with community data. TWINSPAN is divisive hierarchical, flexible‐UPGMA is agglomerative and hierarchical, and ALOC is non‐hierarchical. A balanced design six‐factor model was used to generate 480 data sets of known characteristics. Recovery of the embedded clusters suggests that both flexible UPGMA and ALOC are significantly better than TWINSPAN. No significant difference existed between flexible UPGMA and ALOC.

Keywords

UPGMAHierarchical clusteringEcologyCluster analysisGeographyData miningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceBiology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

A dendrite method for cluster analysis

Abstract A method for identifying clusters of points in a multidimensional Euclidean space is described and its application to taxonomy considered. It reconciles, in a sense, tw...

1974 Communication in Statistics- Theory a... 6351 citations

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
article
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
341-348
Citations
168
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

168
OpenAlex

Cite This

Lee Belbin, C. K. McDonald (1993). Comparing three classification strategies for use in ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science , 4 (3) , 341-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235592

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/3235592