Abstract

The performance of particle swarm optimization using an inertia weight is compared with performance using a constriction factor. Five benchmark functions are used for the comparison. It is concluded that the best approach is to use the constriction factor while limiting the maximum velocity Vmax to the dynamic range of the variable Xmax on each dimension. This approach provides performance on the benchmark functions superior to any other published results known by the authors.

Keywords

InertiaBenchmark (surveying)ConstrictionParticle swarm optimizationDimension (graph theory)LimitingRange (aeronautics)Variable (mathematics)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)PhysicsMathematical analysisMaterials scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligenceClassical mechanicsMechanical engineeringBiology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Handbook of Genetic Algorithms

This book sets out to explain what genetic algorithms are and how they can be used to solve real-world problems. The first objective is tackled by the editor, Lawrence Davis. Th...

1991 7308 citations

Publication Info

Year
2002
Type
article
Volume
1
Pages
84-88
Citations
2939
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2939
OpenAlex

Cite This

R.C. Eberhart, Yan Shi (2002). Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization. , 1 , 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1109/cec.2000.870279

Identifiers

DOI
10.1109/cec.2000.870279