Abstract

Accurate specification and validation of information requirements is critical to the development of organizational information systems. Semantic data models were developed to provide a precise and unambiguous representation of organizational information requirements [9, 17]. They serve as a communication vehicle between analysts and users. After analyzing 11 semantic data models, Biller and Neuhold [3] conclude that there are essentially only two types of data modeling formalisms: entity-attribute-relationship (EAR) models and object-relationship (OR) models. Proponents of each claim their model yields “better” representations [7] than the other. There is, however, little empirical evidence to substantiate these claims.

Keywords

Rotation formalisms in three dimensionsComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)IDEF1XSemantic data modelData modelingData model (GIS)Data miningInformation retrievalObject (grammar)Theoretical computer scienceSoftware engineeringArtificial intelligenceSemantic WebMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
103-115
Citations
113
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

113
OpenAlex

Cite This

Young‐Gul Kim, Salvatore T. March (1995). Comparing data modeling formalisms. Communications of the ACM , 38 (6) , 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1145/203241.203265

Identifiers

DOI
10.1145/203241.203265