Abstract

Abstract Five health status instruments were administered in random order to 50 arthritis patients before and after total joint arthroplasty. Relative efficiency and sensitivity in measurement of change in pain, mobility and physical function, social role and social activity, and global health were assessed. The instruments had highly correlated scores, but had differences in certain dimensions. Inter‐instrument differentials were larger for social and global outcomes than for pain or mobility. No single instrument consistently outperformed the others. A method for determining relative efficiency is described.

Keywords

Sensitivity (control systems)Physical therapyMedicineArthritisSocial functionPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Functional Assessment of the Elderly

• Using specific instruments and scales to measure mental status, nutritional state, visual acuity, gait, and activities of daily living, we studied 79 medical inpatients aged 7...

1987 Archives of Internal Medicine 113 citations

Publication Info

Year
1985
Type
article
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
542-547
Citations
597
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

597
OpenAlex

Cite This

Matthew H. Liang, Martin G. Larson, Karen E. Cullen et al. (1985). Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis & Rheumatism , 28 (5) , 542-547. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780280513

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/art.1780280513