Abstract

Oliver E. Williamson University of California, Berkeley This paper combines institutional economics with aspects of contract law and organization theory to identify and explicate the key differences that distinguish three generic forms of economic organization-market, hybrid, and hierarchy. The analysis shows that the three generic forms are distinguished by different coordinating and control mechanisms and by different abilities to adapt to disturbances. Also, each generic form is supported and defined by a distinctive type of contract law. The costeffective choice of organization form is shown to vary systematically with the attributes of transactions. The paper unifies two hitherto disjunct areas of institutional economics-the institutional environment and the institutions of governance-by treating the institutional environment as a locus of parameters, changes in which parameters bring about shifts in the comparative costs of governance. Changes in property rights, contract law, reputation effects, and uncertainty are investigated.'

Keywords

Economic analysisEconomicsBusinessIndustrial organizationClassical economics

Related Publications

The New Institutional Economics

It is commonly said, and it may be true, that the New Institutional Economics started with my article, “The Nature of the Firm” (1937) with its explicit introduction of transact...

2002 Cambridge University Press eBooks 2395 citations

Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm

This volume collects 22 articles by Masahiko Aoki, selected from writings published over the course of his 45-year academic career. These fascinating essays cover a range of iss...

2013 Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks 957 citations

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
269-269
Citations
7045
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

7045
OpenAlex

Cite This

Oliver E. Williamson (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly , 36 (2) , 269-269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393356

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2393356