Abstract
Summary We have two sets of parameters we wish to estimate, and wonder whether the James-Stein estimator should be applied separately to the two sets or once to the combined problem. We show that there is a class of compromise estimators, Bayesian in nature, which will usually be preferred to either alternative. “The difficulty here is to know what problems are to be combined together— why should not all our estimation problems be lumped together into one grand melée?” George Barnard commenting on the James–Stein estimator, 1962.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Order Statistics Estimators of the Location of the Cauchy Distribution
Abstract In a recent paper in this Journal, Rothenberg, Fisher and Tilanus [1] discuss a class of estimators of the location parameter of the Cauchy distribution, taking the for...
Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study
Abstract Mixture modeling is a widely applied data analysis technique used to identify unobserved heterogeneity in a population. Despite mixture models' usefulness in practice, ...
Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation
Cluster analysis is the automated search for groups of related observations in a dataset. Most clustering done in practice is based largely on heuristic but intuitively reasonab...
Statistical Problems in the Reporting of Clinical Trials
Reports of clinical trials often contain a wealth of data comparing treatments. This can lead to problems in interpretation, particularly when significance testing is used exten...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1973
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 379-402
- Citations
- 189
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1973.tb00968.x