Keywords
Consolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsMedicineScopusRandomized controlled trialClinical trialMEDLINEFamily medicineInternal medicinePolitical science
Related Publications
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasingly important in health care. Clinicians read them to keep up to date with their field,1,2 and they are often used as a...
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasingly important in health care. Clinicians read them to keep up to date with their field,1,2 and they are often used as a...
Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What is it and how do we achieve it?
The goal of evidence-based medicine is ultimately to improve patient outcomes and quality of care. Systematic reviews of the available published evidence are required to identif...
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update
The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC. To provide a...
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
This is the first in a series of four articles The quality of controlled trials is of obvious relevance to systematic reviews. If the “raw material” is flawed then the conclus...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1996
- Type
- letter
- Volume
- 348
- Issue
- 9031
- Pages
- 894-895
- Citations
- 8
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
8
OpenAlex
Cite This
Richárd Pető
(1996).
Clinical trial reporting.
The Lancet
, 348
(9031)
, 894-895.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)64769-1
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)64769-1