Abstract
Despite major laboratory advances in molecular genetic analysis, our data suggest that reported applications in clinical journals often have troubling omissions, deficiencies, and lack of attention to the different, but necessary, principles of clinical epidemiological science. Without suitable attention to fundamental methodological standards, the expected benefits of molecular genetic testing may not be achieved.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Quality of Reporting of Clinical Trials of Dogs and Cats and Associations with Treatment Effects
Background: To address concerns about the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials, and the potential for biased treatment effects in poorly reported trials, medical...
Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust
Advances in medical, biomedical and health services research have reduced the level of uncertainty in clinical practice. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) complement this prog...
En Route to Ethical Recommendations for Gene Transfer Clinical Trials
In Geneva, Switzerland, on 2–3 April 2007, Clinigene-NoE (the European Network for the Advancement of Clinical Gene Transfer and Therapy) and Consert (program on Concerted Safet...
Investigation and management of heritable thrombophilia
There is no internationally accepted definition of thrombophilia. The British Committee for Standards in Haematology (1990) suggested that the term thrombophilia be used to desc...
Terminology and organization of seizures and epilepsies: Radical changes not justified by new evidence
The classifications and terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) provide a conceptual framework for organizing and differentiating epileptic seizures and ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1999
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1919-1919
- Citations
- 176
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1001/jama.281.20.1919