Keywords
TerminologyTypologyManagement scienceSystematic reviewField (mathematics)Data scienceWork (physics)Engineering ethicsComputer scienceProcess managementRisk analysis (engineering)Knowledge managementMedicineSociologyMEDLINELinguisticsPolitical scienceEngineering
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
BackgroundScoping reviews are a relatively new approach to evidence synthesis and currently there exists little guidance regarding the decision to choose between a systematic re...
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently...
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2012
- Type
- editorial
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-28
- Citations
- 986
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
986
OpenAlex
Cite This
David Gough,
James Thomas,
Sandy Oliver
(2012).
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods.
Systematic Reviews
, 1
(1)
, 28-28.
https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1186/2046-4053-1-28