Capital Growth and the Mean-Variance Approach to Portfolio Selection

1971 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 201 citations

Abstract

Three main approaches to the problem of portfolio selection may be discerned in the literature. The first of these is the mean-variance approach, pioneered by Markowitz [21], [22], and Tobin [30]. The second approach is that of chance-constrained programming, apparently initiated by Naslund and Whinston [26]. The third approach, Latane [19] and Breiman [6], [7], has its origin in capital growth considerations. The purpose of this paper is to contrast the mean-variance model, by far the most well-known and most developed model of portfolio selection, with the capital growth model, undoubtedly the least known. In so doing, we shall find the mean-variance model to be severely compromised by the capital growth model in several significant respects.

Keywords

Selection (genetic algorithm)PortfolioVariance (accounting)EconometricsEconomicsModern portfolio theoryStatisticsMathematicsFinancial economicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1971
Type
article
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
517-517
Citations
201
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

201
OpenAlex

Cite This

Nils H. Hakansson (1971). Capital Growth and the Mean-Variance Approach to Portfolio Selection. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , 6 (1) , 517-517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330126

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2330126