Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs

2013 Frontiers in Psychology 8,895 citations

Abstract

Effect sizes are the most important outcome of empirical studies. Most articles on effect sizes highlight their importance to communicate the practical significance of results. For scientists themselves, effect sizes are most useful because they facilitate cumulative science. Effect sizes can be used to determine the sample size for follow-up studies, or examining effects across studies. This article aims to provide a practical primer on how to calculate and report effect sizes for t-tests and ANOVA's such that effect sizes can be used in a-priori power analyses and meta-analyses. Whereas many articles about effect sizes focus on between-subjects designs and address within-subjects designs only briefly, I provide a detailed overview of the similarities and differences between within- and between-subjects designs. I suggest that some research questions in experimental psychology examine inherently intra-individual effects, which makes effect sizes that incorporate the correlation between measures the best summary of the results. Finally, a supplementary spreadsheet is provided to make it as easy as possible for researchers to incorporate effect size calculations into their workflow.

Keywords

Sample size determinationMeta-analysisPsychologyStatistical powerAnalysis of varianceVariance (accounting)Statistical hypothesis testingDesign of experimentsRepeated measures designStatisticsComputer scienceMathematicsMedicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2013
Type
review
Volume
4
Pages
863-863
Citations
8895
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

8895
OpenAlex
1211
Influential
6916
CrossRef

Cite This

Daniël Lakens (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology , 4 , 863-863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

Identifiers

DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
PMID
24324449
PMCID
PMC3840331

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%