Abstract
Abstract The Cabinet customarily appoints Supreme Court Justices based on recommendations from the legal professional bodies in Japan. Previous studies have debated whether and to what extent the Cabinet has respected these recommendations or whether it has made political appointments based on its own preferences. This study examines all appointment cases to identify the extent to which the Cabinet followed or rejected these recommendations. It reveals that the Cabinet disregarded them in 25 out of 192 cases. Accordingly, the author argues that appointing Justices in Japan can be political and that the Cabinet has occasionally exercised its discretion to reject candidates.
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Radiation Resistant Camera System for Monitoring Deuterium Plasma Discharges in the Large Helical Device
Radiation resistant camera system was constructed for monitoring deuterium plasma discharges in the Large Helical Device (LHD). This system has contributed to safe operation dur...
PROTEIN MEASUREMENT WITH THE FOLIN PHENOL REAGENT
Since 1922 when Wu proposed the use of the Folin phenol reagent for the measurement of proteins (l), a number of modified analytical procedures ut.ilizing this reagent have been...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2025
- Type
- article
- Pages
- 1-19
- Citations
- 0
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1017/s1468109925100145