Abstract

Research on business groups' legally independent firms tied together in various formal and informal ways¿is accelerating. Through meta-analytical techniques employed on a database of 141 studies covering 28 different countries, we synthesize this research and extend it by testing several new hypotheses. We find that affiliation diminishes firm performance in general, but also that affiliates are comparatively better off in contexts with underdeveloped financial and labor market institutions. We also trace reduced affiliate performance to specific strategic actions taken at the firm and group levels. Overall, our results indicate that affiliate performance reflects complex processes and motivations.

Keywords

Context (archaeology)Corporate groupTRACE (psycholinguistics)Meta-analysisBusinessGroup (periodic table)Group structureStrategic managementFamily businessMarketingOrganizational behaviorIndustrial organizationEconomicsPsychologyManagementCorporate governanceFinance

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2011
Type
article
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
437-460
Citations
517
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

517
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael Carney, Éric Gedajlovic, Pursey Heugens et al. (2011). Business Group Affiliation, Performance, Context, and Strategy: A Meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal , 54 (3) , 437-460. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61967812

Identifiers

DOI
10.5465/amj.2011.61967812