Abstract

In the 1980s, biomedical indexing and bibliography are at a level unmatched in history. In spite of a monumental effort by librarians, information specialists, and indexers, a large number of students and professionals in the health sciences are unable to capably use the biomedical indexing and abstracting tools that have been so laboriously produced. The authors attempt to trace the origins of bibliographic instruction to the health profession, examine the successes and failures of librarians who tried to teach the medical profession to do library research, and suggest why this type of instruction has not become more widely accepted as a compulsory part of medical education.

Keywords

Search engine indexingTRACE (psycholinguistics)Medical libraryLibrary scienceMedical informationComputer scienceMedical educationWorld Wide WebMedicineInformation retrieval

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

We Need Both Exploratory and Confirmatory

Abstract We often forget how science and engineering function. Ideas come from previous exploration more often than from lightning strokes. Important questions can demand the mo...

1980 The American Statistician 458 citations

Prose and cons about goal-free evaluation

TRACES are what evaluators left behind—discoveries, records, tracks—which made marks on the profession of program evaluation. Published here are excerpts from our past (e.g., ar...

1991 Evaluation Practice 204 citations

Publication Info

Year
1982
Type
article
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
53-76
Citations
3
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3
OpenAlex

Cite This

Robert E. Skinner, Joan M. Marcotte (1982). Bibliographic Instruction in the Health Sciences. Medical Reference Services Quarterly , 1 (2) , 53-76. https://doi.org/10.1300/j115v01n02_04

Identifiers

DOI
10.1300/j115v01n02_04