Abstract
Abstract In the context of a circular economy, sustainable consumption is often seen as the antithesis of current consumption patterns, which have led to the definition of the so-called throwaway society. Reuse may provide a preferred alternative to other waste management options, because it promotes resource efficiency and may significantly reduce environmental impacts. To appraise the environmental benefits related to reuse of goods, a methodology adopting life cycle assessment (LCA) has been developed. A standardized procedure has been developed, identifying reference products within product category subject to reuse, and collecting reliable inventory data as a basis for calculating environmental impact through LCA. A case study on a second-hand shop is presented, and the avoided impacts are quantified. Inventory data were taken both from the literature and directly from sales and surveys submitted to customers. The results are presented, highlighting: 1) for each product category, the average avoided impacts for 1 unit of reused product considered; and 2) for the overall activities of the second-hand shop, the cumulative avoided impacts in 1 yr. In the case study, the higher contribution to avoided impacts comes from the apparel sector, due to the high amount of items sold, followed by the furniture sector, because of the high amount of environmental impacts avoided by the reuse of each single item. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2015;11:373–382. © 2015 SETAC Key Points The proposed methodology defines a standardized procedure for assessing reuse practice in LCA, identifying reference products and collecting reliable inventory data. The reuse of large items is likely to provide higher environmental benefits, whereas small items generate lower benefits per item but are usually sold in larger amounts and provide higher environmental benefits as a whole The methodology 1) allows for the assessment of interventions of waste prevention and reuse, and 2) may help raise awareness of the environmental value of secondhand shops. The results highlight the need for future research focused on reducing uncertainties. This entails expanding current basket of reference products, including best- and worst-case product performance, and exploring various logistic options.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Environmental Impact Evaluation of Conventional Fossil Fuel Production (Oil and Natural Gas) and Enhanced Resource Recovery with Potential CO<sub>2</sub> Sequestration
Conventional oil and natural gas production were compared with two case studies of enhanced resource recovery along with the potential for CO2 sequestration applications. The fi...
Potential Environmental and Human Health Impacts of Rechargeable Lithium Batteries in Electronic Waste
Rechargeable lithium-ion (Li-ion) and lithium-polymer (Li-poly) batteries have recently become dominant in consumer electronic products because of advantages associated with ene...
Beyond Mechanical Recycling: Giving New Life to Plastic Waste
Abstract Increasing the stream of recycled plastic necessitates an approach beyond the traditional recycling via melting and re‐extrusion. Various chemical recycling processes h...
Fuel cycle evaluations of biomass-ethanol and reformulated gasoline. Volume 1
The US Department of Energy (DOE) is using the total fuel cycle analysis (TFCA) methodology to evaluate energy choices. The National Energy Strategy (NES) identifies TFCA as a t...
Consumers’ Perspective on Circular Economy Strategy for Reducing Food Waste
The current linear system of production and consumption is unsustainable. In the food sector, despite the fact that valuable natural resources are intensively used to produce an...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2014
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-382
- Citations
- 151
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/ieam.1614