Abstract

People deviate from the predictions of game theory in two systematic ways. They are not purely self-interested (they care about fairness and try to cooperate with others), and they do not always consider what other players will do before making choices. However, with experience, these deviations sometimes disappear. People learn when they can afford to be unfair and what others will do; their behavior often converges to a game-theoretic equilibrium. A behavioral game theory that explains the initial deviations (and their disappearance) could be useful, especially if the learning process is modeled carefully and better data are gathered.

Keywords

Game theoryMathematical economicsRepeated gameProcess (computing)Computer sciencePsychologyEconomics

Related Publications

Does strategy research need game theory?

Game theory has not been applied much to business strategy. I review some criticism of the game-theoretic approach which inhibits its application, and mention some others. The c...

1991 Strategic Management Journal 194 citations

Evolution and the Theory of Games

In this 1982 book, the theory of games, first developed to analyse economic behaviour, is modified so that it can be applied to evolving populations. John Maynard Smith's concep...

1982 Cambridge University Press eBooks 6826 citations

Institutions and organizations

Institutions—the structures, practices, and meanings that define what people and organizations think, do, and aspire to—are created through process. They are “work in progress” ...

1995 Choice Reviews Online 8140 citations

Publication Info

Year
2025
Type
book-chapter
Pages
261-265
Citations
1345
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1345
OpenAlex

Cite This

Colin F. Camerer (2025). Behavioral Game Theory. Cambridge University Press eBooks , 261-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009422314.012

Identifiers

DOI
10.1017/9781009422314.012