Abstract
Abstract Balanced repeated replications (BRR) is a general method for computing standard errors. It is useful when mathematical distribution theory is impractical or lacking, and especially for analytical statistics based on complex samples where clustering destroys the independence of observations. Presented are results of methods used to measure standard errors of regression coefficients for several multivariate techniques. The basic designs of the several samples comprised two primary selections (PS) per stratum. Each replication was a half-sample, created by selecting one PS from each stratum. The variance of the coefficient , estimated from the entire sample, is measured by , where bj is the same estimator based on a half-sample. To increase the precision of the variance estimate, select k repeated replications and obtain the mean of the k computed variances, . Balanced repeated replications reduce the number of repetitions needed; e.g., 48 balanced replications sufficed for 47 strata in our samples. Though proofs are complete only for linear statistics, rationale and results are offered to indicate that BRR provides needed estimates of errors for nonlinear statistics. The ratios, , of actual standard errors to those of simple random sampling, (srs), are investigated for several statistics in five empirical studies. In each study the average values of exceed 1.00 and range from 1.05 for less clustered to 1.46 for more clustered samples.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
The Jackknife Estimate of Bias The Jackknife Estimate of Variance Bias of the Jackknife Variance Estimate The Bootstrap The Infinitesimal Jackknife The Delta Method and the Infl...
An Application of Multivariate Analysis to Complex Sample Survey Data
Abstract This article adapts a standard method of multivariate analysis to a highly complex sampling design utilizing the method of balanced repeated replication for calculating...
Estimation of Error Rates in Discriminant Analysis
Several methods of estimating error rates in Discriminant Analysis are evaluated by sampling methods. Multivariate normal samples are generated on a computer which have various ...
How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?
Most papers that employ Differences-in-Differences estimation (DD) use many years of data and focus on serially correlated outcomes but ignore that the resulting standard errors...
Estimating Mean and Standard Deviation from the Sample Size, Three Quartiles, Minimum, and Maximum
Background: We sometimes want to include in a meta-analysis data from studies where results are presented as medians and ranges or interquartile ranges rather than as means and ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1970
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 331
- Pages
- 1071-1094
- Citations
- 183
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1970.10481145