Abstract

Energetic, geometric, and magnetic criteria yield quantitatively the same order of aromaticity (antiaromaticity) for the five-membered ring systems 1: the aromatic 6π electron systems are stabilized, their bond lengths are equalized, and the magnetic susceptibility exaltations are diamagnetic. In contrast, the antiaromatic 4π electron systems are destabilized, double bonds are localized, and susceptibility exaltations are paramagnetic.

Keywords

AntiaromaticityAromaticityDiamagnetismRing (chemistry)Magnetic susceptibilityChemistryParamagnetismYield (engineering)CrystallographyRing currentComputational chemistryMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsPhysicsMoleculeMagnetic fieldOrganic chemistryQuantum mechanics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
337-340
Citations
542
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

542
OpenAlex

Cite This

Paul von Ragué Schleyer, Haijun Jiao, Bernd Goldfuß et al. (1995). Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity in Five‐Membered C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>4</sub>X Ring Systems: “Classical” and “Magnetic” Concepts May Not Be “Orthogonal”. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English , 34 (3) , 337-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.199503371

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/anie.199503371