Keywords
RigourSystematic reviewRelevance (law)Critical appraisalPsychological interventionMedical literatureScientific literatureEvidence-based medicineMEDLINEQuality (philosophy)Management scienceEnvironmental resource managementPsychologyEcologyAlternative medicineMedicinePolitical scienceBiologyEnvironmental scienceEngineeringPathology
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The integrative review: updated methodology
Aim. The aim of this paper is to distinguish the integrative review method from other review methods and to propose methodological strategies specific to the integrative review ...
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and tra...
Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews
Healthcare decision makers in search of reliable information that compares health interventions increasingly turn to systematic reviews for the best summary of the evidence. Sys...
Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in Cochrane?
If systematic reviews are to provide the information that people need when making decisions about health and social care, we need to be confident that the methods used to plan, ...
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct,...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2006
- Type
- review
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 409-423
- Citations
- 129
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
129
OpenAlex
8
Influential
111
CrossRef
Cite This
P.D. Roberts,
Gavin Stewart,
Andrew S. Pullin
(2006).
Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine.
Biological Conservation
, 132
(4)
, 409-423.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.034
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.034