Abstract
Evidence from available studies comparing manual and automatic text-retrieval systems does not support the conclusion that intellectual content analysis produces better results than comparable automatic systems.
Keywords
Computer scienceInformation retrievalText retrievalNatural language processing
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
Abstract Motivation Biomedical text mining is becoming increasingly important as the number of biomedical documents rapidly grows. With the progress in natural language processi...
Accounting for Uncertainty in the Tree Topology Has Little Effect on the Decision-Theoretic Approach to Model Selection in Phylogeny Estimation
Currently available methods for model selection used in phylogenetic analysis are based on an initial fixed-tree topology. Once a model is picked based on this topology, a rigor...
A Tool for Reviewers
Peer review lies at the core of science and academic life. In one of its most pervasive forms, peer review for the scientific literature is the main mechanism that research jour...
The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association
These recommendations are based on the following: (1) a formal review and analysis of the recently published world literature on the topic [Medline search up to June 2011]; (2) ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1986
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 648-656
- Citations
- 275
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
275
OpenAlex
Cite This
Gerard Salton
(1986).
Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems.
Communications of the ACM
, 29
(7)
, 648-656.
https://doi.org/10.1145/6138.6149
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1145/6138.6149