Abstract

Four methods of measuring the relative importance of four belief constructs on the group support system (GSS) adoption decision were evaluated for convergent validity. The methods used were: (1) Likert scaled measures, (2) conjoint measurement, (3) direct ratings of importance, and (4) a paired comparison approach. The first method was further examined under three possible approaches: (1) traditional multiple regression, (2) molar analysis, and (3) molecular analysis. Results show partial convergence among the last three methods.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Keywords

Computer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Adoption intention in GSS

Models used to study information technology (IT) adoption were adapted and applied to the group support systems (GSS) domain to determine their applicability and to assess the r...

1995 ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for ... 834 citations

A really temporal logic

A real-time temporal logic for the specification of reactive systems is introduced. The novel feature of the logic, TPTL, is the adoption of temporal operators as quantifiers ov...

1989 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations ... 162 citations

Publication Info

Year
2002
Type
article
Volume
iv
Pages
548-557
Citations
25
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

25
OpenAlex

Cite This

Wynne W. Chin, Abhijit Gopal (2002). An examination of the relative importance of four belief constructs on the GSS adoption decision: a comparison of four methods. , iv , 548-557. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.1993.284232

Identifiers

DOI
10.1109/hicss.1993.284232