Abstract

In connection with a least-squares solution for fitting one matrix, A , to another, B , under optimal choice of a rigid motion and a dilation, Schönemann and Carroll suggested two measures of fit: a raw measure, e , and a refined similarity measure, e s , which is symmetric. Both measures share the weakness of depending upon the norm of the target matrix, B , e.g. , e ( A , kB ) ≠ e ( A , B ) for k ≠ 1. Therefore, both measures are useless for answering questions of the type: “Does A fit B better than A fits C ?”. In this note two new measures of fit are suggested which do not depend upon the norms of A and B , which are (0, 1)-bounded, and which, therefore, provide meaningful answers for comparative analyses.

Keywords

MathematicsMeasure (data warehouse)Matrix (chemical analysis)Bounded functionAlgorithmCombinatoricsStatisticsComputer scienceMathematical analysis

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1974
Type
article
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
423-427
Citations
63
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

63
OpenAlex

Cite This

James C. Lingoes, Peter H. Schönemann (1974). Alternative Measures of Fit for the Schönemann-Carroll Matrix Fitting Algorithm. Psychometrika , 39 (4) , 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291666

Identifiers

DOI
10.1007/bf02291666