Abstract
Treatment comparisons from clinical studies involving dichotomous outcomes are often summarized using risk ratios. Risk ratios are typically used because the underlying statistical model is often consistent with the underlying biological mechanism of the treatment and they are easily interpretable. The use of odds ratios to summarize treatment effects has been discouraged, especially in studies in which outcomes are common, largely because odds ratios differ from risk ratios and are frequently interpreted incorrectly as risk ratios. In this article, the author contends that risk ratios can be easily misinterpreted and that, in many cases, odds ratios should be preferred, especially in studies in which outcomes are common.
Keywords
Odds ratioOddsMedicineDiagnostic odds ratioStatisticsConfidence intervalInternal medicineLogistic regressionMathematics
MeSH Terms
HumansOdds RatioOutcome AssessmentHealth CareShockHemorrhagic
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Statistical Significance Versus Clinical Importance of Observed Effect Sizes: What Do P Values and Confidence Intervals Really Represent?
Effect size measures are used to quantify treatment effects or associations between variables. Such measures, of which >70 have been described in the literature, include unst...
INFERENCES ON ODDS RATIOS, RELATIVE RISKS, AND RISK DIFFERENCES BASED ON STANDARD REGRESSION PROGRAMS
Statistical analyses of the joint effects of several factors (covariates) on the risk of disease, death, or other dichotomous outcomes, are frequently based on a model that rela...
Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Survival in Patients with Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke
Background Differences in risk factor profiles between patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke may have an impact on subsequent mortality. Aim To explore cardiovascular di...
Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke Risk, and Warfarin Therapy Revisited
Background and Purpose— Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke. This study aims to update the knowledge about AF and associated stroke risk and bene...
Estimating the Relative Risk in Cohort Studies and Clinical Trials of Common Outcomes
Logistic regression yields an adjusted odds ratio that approximates the adjusted relative risk when disease incidence is rare (<10%), while adjusting for potential confounders. ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2002
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1430-1434
- Citations
- 71
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
71
OpenAlex
Cite This
Thomas D. Cook
(2002).
Advanced Statistics: Up with Odds Ratios! A Case for Odds Ratios When Outcomes Are Common.
Academic Emergency Medicine
, 9
(12)
, 1430-1434.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01616.x
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01616.x
- PMID
- 12460851