Abstract

Most experimental and theoretical studies of adiabatic optimization use stoquastic Hamiltonians, whose ground states are expressible using only real nonnegative amplitudes. This raises a question as to whether classical Monte Carlo methods can simulate stoquastic adiabatic algorithms with polynomial overhead. Here, we analyze diffusion Monte Carlo algorithms. We argue that, based on differences between L1 and L2 normalized states, these algorithms suffer from certain obstructions preventing them from efficiently simulating stoquastic adiabatic evolution in generality. In practice however, we obtain good performance by introducing a method that we call Substochastic Monte Carlo. In fact, our simulations are good classical optimization algorithms in their own right, competitive with the best previously known heuristic solvers for MAX-k-SAT at k=2,3,4.

Keywords

Monte Carlo methodAdiabatic processStatistical physicsDiffusionKinetic Monte CarloPhysicsMonte Carlo method in statistical physicsDynamic Monte Carlo methodMonte Carlo molecular modelingHybrid Monte CarloMarkov chain Monte CarloMathematicsThermodynamicsStatistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Adiabatic quantum computation

Adiabatic quantum computing (AQC) started as an approach to solving optimization problems, and has evolved into an important universal alternative to the standard circuit model ...

2018 Reviews of Modern Physics 1385 citations

Publication Info

Year
2016
Type
article
Volume
94
Issue
4
Citations
33
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

33
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael Jarret, Stephen P. Jordan, Brad Lackey (2016). Adiabatic optimization versus diffusion Monte Carlo methods. Physical review. A/Physical review, A , 94 (4) . https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.94.042318

Identifiers

DOI
10.1103/physreva.94.042318