Abstract

Similarity data can be represented by additive trees. In this model, objects are represented by the external nodes of a tree, and the dissimilarity between objects is the length of the path joining them. The additive tree is less restrictive than the ultrametric tree, commonly known as the hierarchical clustering scheme. The two representations are characterized and compared. A computer program, ADDTREE, for the construction of additive trees is described and applied to several sets of data. A comparison of these results to the results of multidimensional scaling illustrates some empirical and theoretical advantages of tree representations over spatial representations of proximity data.

Keywords

Ultrametric spaceMultidimensional scalingSimilarity (geometry)Tree (set theory)MathematicsHierarchical clusteringCluster analysisScalingPath (computing)SimilitudeData miningTheoretical computer scienceComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMetric spaceCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsImage (mathematics)

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Features of similarity.

The metric and dimensional assumptions that underlie the geometric representation of similarity are questioned on both theoretical and empirical grounds. A new set-theoretical a...

1977 Psychological Review 7176 citations

Publication Info

Year
1977
Type
article
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
319-345
Citations
598
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

598
OpenAlex

Cite This

Shmuel Sattath, Amos Tversky (1977). Additive Similarity Trees. Psychometrika , 42 (3) , 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02293654

Identifiers

DOI
10.1007/bf02293654