Abstract

Abstract Objective: To evaluate a decision aid (DA) designed to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening. Methods: Twelve work sites were randomly assigned to an intervention or nonintervention comparison condition. Intervention sites received access to a computer-tailored DA at the workplace. Male employees age 45 years and above (n = 625) completed surveys at baseline and at 3-month follow-up, documenting aspects of informed decision making. Results: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, men in the intervention group were significantly more likely to have made a screening decision and to have improved knowledge without increased decisional conflict, relative to men in the comparison group. These changes were observed despite the fact that only 30% of men in intervention sites used the DA. Among DA users, similar improvements were observed, although the magnitudes of changes were substantially greater, and significant improvements in decision self-efficacy were observed. Conclusions: A DA offered in the workplace promoted decision making, improved knowledge, and increased decision self-efficacy among users, without increasing decisional conflict. However, participation was suboptimal, suggesting that better methods for engaging men in workplace interventions are needed. Impact Statement: This trial shows the efficacy of a computer-tailored DA in promoting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening. The DA was delivered through work sites, thereby providing access to resources required to participate in informed decision making without requiring a medical appointment. However, participation rates were suboptimal, and additional strategies for engaging men are needed. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(9); 2172–86. ©2010 AACR.

Keywords

Decision aidsPsychological interventionIntervention (counseling)Randomized controlled trialProstate cancerMedicineProstate cancer screeningCancerCancer screeningFamily medicinePhysical therapyNursingAlternative medicineProstate-specific antigenSurgeryInternal medicine

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2010
Type
article
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
2172-2186
Citations
53
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

53
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jennifer D. Allen, Megan Othus, Alton Hart et al. (2010). A Randomized Trial of a Computer-Tailored Decision Aid to Improve Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Results from the <i>Take the Wheel</i> Trial. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention , 19 (9) , 2172-2186. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0410

Identifiers

DOI
10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0410