Abstract

The panel data unit root test suggested by Levin and Lin (LL) has been widely used in several applications, notably in papers on tests of the purchasing power parity hypothesis. This test is based on a very restrictive hypothesis which is rarely ever of interest in practice. The Im–Pesaran–Shin (IPS) test relaxes the restrictive assumption of the LL test. This paper argues that although the IPS test has been offered as a generalization of the LL test, it is best viewed as a test for summarizing the evidence from a number of independent tests of the sample hypothesis. This problem has a long statistical history going back to R. A. Fisher. This paper suggests the Fisher test as a panel data unit root test, compares it with the LL and IPS tests, and the Bonferroni bounds test which is valid for correlated tests. Overall, the evidence points to the Fisher test with bootstrap‐based critical values as the preferred choice. We also suggest the use of the Fisher test for testing stationarity as the null and also in testing for cointegration in panel data.

Keywords

Unit rootNull hypothesisBonferroni correctionOne- and two-tailed testsEconometricsStatistical hypothesis testingGoldfeld–Quandt testTest (biology)StatisticsExact testMathematicsUnit root testNominal levelScore testPanel dataWald testCointegrationPearson's chi-squared testTest statisticZ-testConfidence interval

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1999
Type
article
Volume
61
Issue
S1
Pages
631-652
Citations
6612
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

6612
OpenAlex

Cite This

G. S. Maddala, Shaowen Wu (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics , 61 (S1) , 631-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631