Abstract
Saturation of data has been acknowledged by many social scientists as evidence of rigor in qualitative research. Though there is a consensus about its definition and usefulness in qualitative research, the methods for achieving saturation are scarce while the social scientists who mention data saturation in their research methodologies do not adequately describe how this is achieved. This paper describes a new method for achieving saturation in studies that use interviews. The method is called Comparative Method for Themes Saturation (CoMeTS). CoMeTS is comparative in two ways. First, all themes from all interviews are compared with each other. Second, the sequence of interviews is reordered multiple times in order to check saturation again. This is because the sequence of interviews during the check makes saturation vary and, therefore, reordering helps confirming saturation. This paper concludes that CoMeTS is a simple, comparative and holistic method for achieving saturation and that it can be used in complicated qualitative studies.
Keywords
Saturation (graph theory)Qualitative researchSociologyRigourComputer scienceSocial scienceEpistemologyMathematics
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales
The concept of data saturation, defined as 'information redundancy' or the point at which no new themes or codes 'emerge' from data, is widely referenced in thematic analysis (T...
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation
Saturation is a core guiding principle to determine sample sizes in qualitative research, yet little methodological research exists on parameters that influence saturation. Our ...
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests
To review empirical studies that assess saturation in qualitative research in order to identify sample sizes for saturation, strategies used to assess saturation, and guidance w...
Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail
The aim of this paper is to show the way in which the decision trail of a qualitative research process can be maintained. It is argued that the trustworthiness (rigour) of a stu...
How Many Interviews Are Enough?
Guidelines for determining nonprobabilistic sample sizes are virtually nonexistent. Purposive samples are the most commonly used form of nonprobabilistic sampling, and their siz...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2017
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 571-588
- Citations
- 231
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
231
OpenAlex
Cite This
Costas S. Constantinou,
Μαρία Γεωργίου,
Maria Perdikogianni
(2017).
A comparative method for themes saturation (CoMeTS) in qualitative interviews.
Qualitative Research
, 17
(5)
, 571-588.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116686650
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/1468794116686650